Speakout (version 2)
This speakout variation was designed by Wendy Sarkission to ensure that “all the voices are heard”. In this version, the main emphasis is on establishing an environment in which individuals feel comfortable and able to give their views on a range of topics. All community members are invited to attend the nominated venue and give their view on the selected topics. Their input is documented and later collated and circulated. It is a productive and useful alternative to a public meeting in which only a few people are given the opportunity to actually speak, the majority there only to listen. They are particularly useful where there are a number of sub-topics around a main theme or issue affecting a wide number of stakeholders.
The two major elements are:
- A ‘listener’ and a ’scribe’ is allocated for each sub-topic.
- The venue is open over a period of time or series of times (such as a weekend and some evenings).
Whilst there might be information made available about the theme for the event, the main purpose is to hear what stakeholders views are about the sub-topics. They are not a mechanism for trying to convince stakeholders of a particular viewpoint.
For community members to be able to have their say on a topic in a safe and friendly environment that is flexible to their daily timetable.
Organisers get to hear a wide variety of views around a number of topics or sub-topics of an issue, while members of the community get to be heard.
- Use instead of a public meeting.
- Great for getting people’s input.
- Good to demonstrate that people have been listened to.
- Needs ‘facilitators’ as the listeners and scribes, not specialists on the topic.
- Best if another person is available to type up topics ‘on the go’ rather than waiting to the end of the session.
- Credibility can be compromised by people wanting to use the event to promote a particular point of view. These can be organisers as well as associated special interest groups wanting to ‘set up a stall’. This is not the place unless carefully structured.
- Venue (e.g. library, hall, tent, sheltered outside place)
- Personnel (e.g. ‘listeners’ and ‘scribes’ for each topic)
- Tables and chairs
- Butcher’s paper
Can be used for:
- Engage community
- Discover community issues
- Develop community capacity
- Develop action plan
- Build alliances, consensus
Number of people required to help organise:
- Medium (2- 12 people)
- Large (> 30)
- Short (< 6 weeks)
Skill level/support required:
- Low (No specialist skills)
- Low (< AUD$1,000)
- High (Stakeholders participate in decision)
- Medium (Options noted)
- Medium (Some new elements)
- Low (Traditional)
- The organisers identify a number of ‘hot’ issues or topics that they would like members of the community to consider and have input into.
- A suitable location, such as a hall, library or other accessible public place is rented for a period of time (e.g. one or two days).
- A table and flip chart is provided for each topic, together with a ‘listener’ and a ‘scribe’. This is most important, and comprises the largest organisational part of the project.
- The event is advertised, and members of the public invited to attend at their convenience over the allocated time.
- Community members go to each topic table that interests them, the listener ‘actively listens’ to what they have to say, with the scribe writing it down on the flip chart. No attempt is made to enter into a dialogue around the topic, the role of the listener being to ensure that the participant remains ‘on topic’, and expresses their view for the scribe to write it down.
- At the end of the time period, the comments collected from all participants are ‘themed’ by the organisers, and the results distributed.
- Sarkission, W, Cook, A, Walsh, K (1997) Community participation in practice: a practical guide, Institute of Science and Technology Policy, Murdoch University.