DSE Home > Forests > Publications & Research > Reports > Forests Report Series > 95-4 Rainforest in Victoria: A Review of the Scientific Basis of Current and Proposed Protection Measures

II. Scientific Evidence Regarding Rainforest Ecology and Protection

5. TIME SCALES OF RAINFOREST ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES

An important aspect in the evaluation of protection measures for Victorian rainforests is the recovery time of mature rainforest and ecotonal vegetation from disturbances of different kinds. If the consequences of edge effects are transitory on the time scale of harvesting rotations then they may safely be ignored. Similarly, if the kind, frequency and intensity of disturbances that result from human activities are similar to those that could be expected in a pre-industrialised environment, then we may expect that the rainforest communities are sufficiently resilient to cope with modern disturbances. Certainly, natural disturbance regimes are a part of the ecology of Nothofagus forests elsewhere in the world (Veblen 1989, Stewart et al. 1991, Armesto et al. 1992).

There has been widespread disturbance of much of Victoria's rainforest in the past, especially in the Central Highlands, the Strzelecki Ranges and the Otway Ranges associated with logging activities and access to European settlements. These disturbances varied greatly in their nature, extent and persistence. However, there has been no systematic, retrospective study of the short or long term effects of these disturbances. As a result, it is not possible to use this information to make any inferences on the resilience or stability of rainforest stands. The few studies of rainforest disturbance in Victoria have focused on regeneration dynamics following fire. Howard (1973a) found in cool temperate rainforest at Mt Donna Buang that rapid recovery of the N. cunninghamii forest understorey from fire precluded eucalypt regeneration from seed. Howard (1981) suggested that the widespread fires in Victoria in 1939 reduced the distribution of rainforest to its most sheltered enclaves, and that local canopy closure on burnt rainforest sites required 40 years for canopy closure and will require a further 30 years before there is a continuous rainforest canopy beneath emergent eucalypts. If there is another fire within 40 years, before crown closure, then tree and understorey plants are susceptible and eucalypt recruitment would be abundant, resulting in a mixed forest, if in fact Nothofagus survives a second fire. There is evidence that Acmena, Pittosporum and Tristaniopsis were killed outright by a single fire in some stands (McMahon 1987). There are no data on the resilience of other rainforest species to repeated fires at short intervals.

There are many studies of the recovery from disturbance of Australian temperate rainforests, some based on inferences made from regeneration dynamics and growth rates, and others based on direct evidence. Horne and Gwalter (1987) observed that the time to achieve overstorey recovery in warm temperate rainforest following 25%, 65% and 75% removal of basal area by selective logging is <60 years, 60-100 years and >100 years respectively. Eucalyptus regnans stands in the Florentine Valley of Tasmania that were not burnt for 100-300 years normally have an understorey dominated by rainforest trees. Stands that have survived a fire less than 100 years ago have a sclerophyll understorey originating from the fire (Cremer and Mount 1965). Mount (1979) suggested that wet sclerophyll forests adjacent to rainforest generally have a fire frequency of 20-120 years. Bowman and Jackson (1981) suggested fire-free intervals of 200-400 years are necessary for the maintenance of cool temperate rainforest, and that intervals greater than 400 years result in dominance of Tasmanian rainforest by fire sensitive gymnosperms. In cool temperate rainforest in Tasmania, the time taken for myrtle beech and celery-top pine (Phyllocladus aspleniifolius) to attain 60cm dbhob was up to 200 and about 400 years respectively, and the time for Huon pine (Lagarostrobus franklinii) to attain 60 cm was at least 500 years, based on growth functions determined from stem analysis (Hickey and Felton 1987). McMahon (1987) speculated that floristic and structural changes in warm temperate rainforest ecotones that result from hot fires will take 100 years for the demise of the sclerophyll understorey and a further 200 years for the senescence of the eucalypt overstorey and replacement by Acmena smithii (see also, Ashton and Frankenberg 1976, Howard 1973a, McMahon 1987). Such fire-free periods are unlikely in sclerophyll forest. Woodgate et al. (1994) suggested that in damp forest, early senescence of eucalypts only begins after about 250 years. In such circumstances, frequent recurrent low intensity fires will not affect the eucalypt overstorey but would eliminate or reduce the A. smithii understorey. Chambers et al. (1977) suggested the regeneration time of temperate rainforest ecosystems is likely to be of the order of 200 years or more. Attiwill (1994b), citing the work of Cremer (1960), Mount (1979) and Ashton (1981a) among others, suggested that fire intervals ('return times') of 350-400 years are close to the life span of most eucalypts, allowing the development of rainforest. With fire intervals of 100-350 years, eucalypts are retained with an understorey of rainforest species. Fire intervals less than 100 years result in sclerophyll forest or other vegetation types.

Long-term changes in cool temperate rainforest composition are possible, depending on the initial floristic composition and on the spatial scale of disturbance. This is because some canopy species are able to regenerate vegetatively (eg., N. cunninghamii, A. moschatum, E lucida), some establish by vigorous seedling growth (E. lucida) and some species are able to dominate through long life spans following a single recruitment opportunity, even if recruitment by conspecifics is unlikely (eg., P. aspleniifolius; Read and Hill 1988). Chesterfield et al. (1990) found that 5 years after a severe fire in warm temperate rainforest in East Gippsland, vegetation composition was dominated by species that characterise mature rainforest. There were also large increases in populations of Acacia melanoxylon, eucalypt species and sclerophyllous shrubs. They suggested that earlier fires had influenced the species composition, facilitating invasion by sclerophyllous species and that frequent fires (<40 to 50 years) would result in the replacement of the rainforest by a fire-dependent disclimax sclerophyllous community. Such changes, if they occur, are unlikely to be easily detected in the short term, even over the period during which clear felling has been the most important harvesting technique in Victoria. Careful sample design will be necessary to discriminate these changes from the many other confounding processes that determine species composition at a site.

The regeneration time of rainforest ecosystems is likely to be of the order of several centuries. The incursion of fire into ecotones on a shorter time scale and harvesting in ecotones where they extend beyond 20m will effectively change the interactions between rainforest and adjacent sclerophyll forest. Harvesting in mixed forest will have important consequences for dynamics within these communities. The interpretation of the importance of these impacts depends on the amount of harvesting that occurs in an ecotone or a mixed forest and on our ability to exclude fire from the ecotone. There may be cumulative effects in which repeated disturbance will favour some species, leading to some permanent changes in floristic composition.



printer friendly version