DSE Home > Forests > Publications & Research > Reports > Forests Report Series > 95-4 Rainforest in Victoria: A Review of the Scientific Basis of Current and Proposed Protection Measures

I. Introduction

1. TERMS OF REFERENCE AND PROCEDURES

1.1 Terms of reference

The aim of this study is to review the scientific basis of protection measures for rainforest currently practiced by the Victorian Department of Conservation and Natural Resources (CNR). Specifically, the review intends to:

  • outline scientific knowledge relating to the protection of rainforest;
  • report on the measures required to provide minimum adequate protection of rainforest;
  • evaluate the Department of Conservation and Natural Resources' Sites of Significance for rainforest proposed by the Flora Section;
  • evaluate the adequacy of the use of buffers between coupes and rainforest; and
  • recommend directions for future research aimed at improving the mechanisms for rainforest protection in Victoria.

The review seeks to identify potential problems in the conservation of rainforest, and to evaluate these threats given Victorian conditions and context. The terms of reference necessarily predicate a review of several more general components of the ecology of rainforest and other plant communities. These include the factors controlling the distribution of rainforest in the pre-European environment, the impact that changes in fire regimes have had on the distribution of rainforest, the potential effects of timber harvesting operations in the vicinity of rainforest, the effects of harvesting on the successional dynamics of the rainforest interface, and the characterisation and quantification of edge effects. Such questions relate to several different kinds of temperate rainforest, and must be evaluated along a range of moisture and disturbance gradients.

The terms of reference were developed in consultation with David Holmes (Manager, Forest Management Branch), Max Kitchell (Manager, Flora and Fauna Branch), David Parkes (Manager, Flora Section) and Mike Leonard (Manager, Forest Environment Section). The review of current protection measures is based on the boundary of rainforest as defined by the Department's published policy. It was agreed that a definition of rainforest should not be specifically addressed, although the interpretation of the definition currently accepted by CNR in policy and field practice is central to the review. The review is to include both an evaluation of competing opinions on the adequacy of current protection measures and an evaluation of how to implement different alternatives in the planning process.

Page Top


1.2 Procedures

The School of Forestry of the University of Melbourne was contracted in August, 1993, to review the scientific basis for the protection of rainforest in Victoria. Scientific literature relevant to the protection of Victorian rainforest was reviewed in the latter part of 1993, and a draft of this review was circulated to CNR for comment on the breadth, context and interpretations in January, 1994. The feedback was in the form of suggested changes and additional material. Background information on the development of rainforest protection measures was then reviewed, together with details and correspondence of the Rainforest Technical Committee and the development of the definition of rainforest. Field trips were made in May and June, 1994 to the East Gippsland and Central Highlands regions of Victoria, in the company of CNR staff from Flora and Fauna, Forest Management and the Regional offices. Several aspects of the management and protection of rainforest were examined, including impact measurement and monitoring studies currently under way. Data base managers in Forest Planning provided information on the distribution of rainforest and on the availability of data for studies of different kinds that may be used in the evaluation of impacts on Victorian rainforest.

The second draft of the report was prepared in June, July and August, 1994. The report was distributed to Forest Management, Forest Research, Flora and Fauna (CNR) and the School of Forestry (University of Melbourne) for review by their staff. Their comments were taken into account before preparation of the third and final draft. The final draft was submitted in March, 1995.



printer friendly version